<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software:  Just Plumbing or Mad Science?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/developers/software-plumbing-mad-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/developers/software-plumbing-mad-science/</link>
	<description>Humans + Software Development = Always Interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Three Motivators For Developers (Hint: not money!) &#124; Lessons of Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/developers/software-plumbing-mad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Three Motivators For Developers (Hint: not money!) &#124; Lessons of Failure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/?p=529#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothing is more tedious, horrific, or uninspiring to developers to work on projects that lack any real meaning in the world.  Or lack any real direction.  Or lack any substantial need from the company.  In fact, you can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothing is more tedious, horrific, or uninspiring to developers to work on projects that lack any real meaning in the world.  Or lack any real direction.  Or lack any substantial need from the company.  In fact, you can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey Pomytkin</title>
		<link>http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/developers/software-plumbing-mad-science/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey Pomytkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/?p=529#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Agree, just see less difference in pluming and since skills for programmers. I just hope people wouldn’t take it literally and think of software “plumbers” as data entry positions, etc. – fortunately good developer always can look for ways to minimize pluming and often develop new tool or contribute to it’s development. So, if analogy necessary I’d rather point to civil engineer or architect as alternative to inventor – getting dipper into business domain vs. into guts of pluming tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, just see less difference in pluming and since skills for programmers. I just hope people wouldn’t take it literally and think of software “plumbers” as data entry positions, etc. – fortunately good developer always can look for ways to minimize pluming and often develop new tool or contribute to it’s development. So, if analogy necessary I’d rather point to civil engineer or architect as alternative to inventor – getting dipper into business domain vs. into guts of pluming tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

